[Mesa-users] Mass Loss Time steps
Shaquann Seadrow
sseadrow at udel.edu
Tue Sep 17 22:14:15 UTC 2024
Hi Frank,
Thanks for the reply. Apologies for forgetting to attach the inlist. I've
attached them (I've been tinkering with this using the standard
run_star_extras). I'm seeing that the varcontrol_target is limiting the
time step. What exactly is quantifying "variation" (the previous
"varcontrol" values that is checked against varcontrol-target ) that
decides whether to increase or decrease the next time step? I see in
section B.3 of the 2013 paper, you're evaluating a low-pass filter that
uses the previous varcontrol? Is that still the case in the current
versions? Is there a way to tell what change is setting the limit?
Shaquann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20240917/9c5f0d7a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: inlist_pgstar
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1145 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20240917/9c5f0d7a/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: inlist
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 807 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20240917/9c5f0d7a/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: inlist_basic_non_magnetic
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20240917/9c5f0d7a/attachment-0002.obj>
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list