[Mesa-users] A query regarding re-running mesa binary from intermediate steps
Pulkit Ojha
pulkit.ojha at niser.ac.in
Wed Feb 8 17:51:27 UTC 2023
Thank you very much for your reply.
I'm attaching my inlist files here(as a zip file), including
run_binary_extras. This setup has been previously used to verify
published results, therefore I don't think any problem should arise due to
the binary setup.
In this case, I've tried to use "max_model_number" in my inlist1 file to
stop MESA at some intermediate step and restart it from there. I was using
a Python for Loop to stop MESA at every step by setting "max_model_number =
1" and restarting it using "./re". But the binary module used to start from
1 after 42 steps whereas the star module continued to evolve. I did it
manually(without python, in terminal) for 42 steps and faced the same
problem, during which I also observed that the physical parameters being
calculated (for step >= 30) in this way are different from those calculated
without any intermediate stop.
I'm also sharing my Python notebook which can be useful to you, where you
can find the first issue in the output of the notebook.
Truly
Pulkit
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:46 PM Evan Bauer <evan.bauer.astro at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Pulkit,
>
> This does sound like a problem, but it's not immediately obvious what the
> source of the issue is. Could you share some more details to help us
> diagnose the issue? E.g. a minimal binary work directory setup that
> reproduces the issue, and some plots that show what ends up being different
> about the evolution.
>
> Cheers,
> Evan
>
> On Feb 4, 2023, at 1:11 PM, Pulkit Ojha via Mesa-users <
> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
>
> Dear MESA users,
>
> I'm working with MESA binary (evolving a donor star with a point mass) and
> currently I have to stop MESA binary at intermediate steps using the
> "max_model_number" option for the donor star and then restart it again from
> that step only using "./re'. If I do it repeatedly for 30 steps (stopping
> and restarting at every step), then the calculated binary parameters turn
> out to be *different* as compared to the case when MESA has run without
> stopping at intermediate steps.
> Also, the binary module re-starts from steps 1 after 41 steps whereas the
> donor star keeps on evolving.
>
> Any possible suggestions why is this happening and how can this be
> avoided? Such as anything about the "./re" option I might have been
> missing.
>
> Yours Truly
> Pulkit
> --
> Pulkit Ojha
> 5th Year Integrated MSc.,
> School of Physical Sciences,
> National Institute of Science Education and Research
> <https://www.niser.ac.in/>
> Bhubaneswar, INDIA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
>
>
>
--
Pulkit Ojha
5th Year Integrated MSc.,
School of Physical Sciences,
National Institute of Science Education and Research
<https://www.niser.ac.in/>
Bhubaneswar, INDIA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20230208/e8bcc836/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MESA_RUN_18thJan_Pulkit.ipynb
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 261624 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20230208/e8bcc836/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Evolution_FIles_Code.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 9316 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20230208/e8bcc836/attachment.zip>
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list