[Mesa-users] Changing reaction rate issu in PPISN
Warrick Ball
W.H.Ball at bham.ac.uk
Fri Jan 21 08:35:21 UTC 2022
D'oh! Mathieu's suggestion would be
set_min_D_mix = .true. ! oops
min_D_mix = 1d-2
Cheers,
Warrick
___________
Warrick Ball
Postdoc, School of Physics and Astronomy
University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT
W.H.Ball at bham.ac.uk
+44 (0)121 414 4552
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> I just searched `controls.defaults` in r12778 and found the following near
> the end of "mixing parameters" (just before "rotation controls"):
>
> set_min_D_mix = .false.
> mass_lower_limit_for_min_D_mix = 0d0
> mass_upper_limit_for_min_D_mix = 1d99
> min_D_mix = 1d3
>
> set_min_D_mix_in_H_He = .false.
> min_D_mix_in_H_He = 1d3
>
> set_min_D_mix_below_Tmax = .false.
> min_D_mix_below_Tmax = 1d3
>
> min_center_Ye_for_min_D_mix = 0.47d0
>
> They're all present in r15140 so you can see the HTML version here:
>
> https://docs.mesastar.org/en/r15140/reference/controls.html#set-min-d-mix
>
> I think Mathieu's suggestions corresponds to
>
> set_min_D_mix = .false.
> min_D_mix = 1d-2
>
> Cheers,
> Warrick
>
>
> ___________
>
> Warrick Ball
> Postdoc, School of Physics and Astronomy
> University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT
> W.H.Ball at bham.ac.uk
> +44 (0)121 414 4552
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Jeremy Sakstein wrote:
>
>> Hi Mathieu,
>> "Regarding running PPISN at low-Z: I would look at how sharp the core
>> edges are in these models. Once wind-mass loss becomes too small, the
>> cores become sharper and it is hard for pulses to get through them (as I
>> found in models with no-winds at
>> finite Z). If you really want low-Z model an idea could be add some small
>> extra mixing (D_mix = 1d-2 for example) to smooth the edges a bit without
>> messing up the stars too much. N.B: I have not tested this myself."
>>
>> Thanks for this, I was not aware this could be an issue and am interested
>> in testing it. I looked for D_mix in controls_defalts but couldn't find a
>> verbatim control with that name. What's the control I should be looking
>> for?
>>
>> I am using MESA-r12778.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 9:52 AM Mathieu Renzo via Mesa-users
>> <mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
>> Hi Vaishnav and Harshda,
>>
>> I believe you want to set num_special_rate_factors=1 in your inlist.
>>
>> The exact setup to reproduce Farmer et al. results is available on
>> zenodo: https://zenodo.org/record/3346593
>> and https://zenodo.org/record/3559859 (and I believe
>> https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...924...39M/abstract
>> successfully used these).
>>
>> Regarding running PPISN at low-Z: I would look at how sharp the core
>> edges are in these models. Once wind-mass loss becomes too small,
>> the cores become sharper and it is hard for pulses to get through
>> them (as I found in models with
>> no-winds at finite Z). If you really want low-Z model an idea could
>> be add some small extra mixing (D_mix = 1d-2 for example) to smooth
>> the edges a bit without messing up the stars too much. N.B: I have
>> not tested this myself.
>>
>> Hope this helps!
>> Mathieu
>>
>> On 1/20/22 2:17 PM, Vaishnav Rao via Mesa-users wrote:
>> Dear MESA users,
>>
>> We have been playing around with the PPISN test suite for the past year in
>> an attempt to understand and reproduce the black hole mass gap. We were
>> facing difficulties in incorporating custom reaction rates for the C12-O16
>> reaction in
>> our test suite.
>>
>> We have been attempting to reproduce the plots of the effect of CO
>> reaction rates on the final BH mass as in Farmer et al., 2019 and Farmer
>> et al., 2020 . Using the reaction rates from the files of the latter, we
>> tried to run a modified
>> test suite with recommended settings (which had already run for the
>> default rates for us before). However, upon comparing the final BH masses
>> for 0 sigma and -1 sigma rate tables, there was no major difference, even
>> though there is an
>> expected difference of 8M in the final BH masses. Clearly the lines
>>
>> num_special_rate_factors=0
>> reaction_for_special_factor(1)='r_c12_ag_o16'
>> special_rate_factor(1)=1.0d0 ! Used for linear scaling of rates
>>
>> rate_tables_dir='rates/c12alpha/rate_tables-1s’
>>
>> which specify the path to the modified rate tables do not seem to be
>> having any major effect on the simulations.
>>
>> Our simulations are for metallicities of 1d-3 (in accordance with Farmer
>> et al., 2019). We chose this metallicity because our simulations for 1d-5
>> ( as in Farmer et al., 2020) faced multiple convergence issues (mostly
>> ‘hydro_failed’ or
>> too many retries). According to the other posts we saw on the MESA mailing
>> list archives, many others too faced convergence issues of this sort for
>> such low metallicities. We are not sure whether using the same rate tables
>> for different
>> metallicities is correct.
>>
>> Our inlist, run_star_extras, and rate tables (zip file) have been attached
>> for reference. Any advice on solving this issue would be appreciated.
>>
>> Software details:
>> MESA version: r12778
>> SDK version: March 25, 2020
>> OS: Cluster, 64-bit Linux
>>
>> Thanking you in advance,
>> Vaishnav V. Rao & Harshda Saxena
>> Department of Physics
>> Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
>> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu Renzo
>> Flatiron Research Fellow
>> Center for Computational Astrophysics
>> Columbia University
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users__;!!IBzWLUs!ABtxVxvf_FCkApSkViSy473uCSgoV0h6ZsUFt3-meFhtMdAI8BR-D0E9ouLqrlXpcfY$
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy Sakstein (He/Him/His)
>> Assistant Professor of Theoretical PhysicsDepartment of Physics &
>> Astronomy
>> University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
>> Watanabe Hall
>> 2505 Correa Road
>> Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA
>> http://www.jeremysakstein.com
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
>
>
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list