[Mesa-users] Heavy rotation in massive stars
Francis Timmes
fxt44 at mac.com
Thu Aug 18 17:29:04 UTC 2022
hi amar,
i suspect the issue is the same as in the recently posted
https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/2022-August/013973.html
that is, insufficient timestep resolution to observe the initial imposed rotation profile evolve.
fxt
> On Aug 18, 2022, at 2:34 AM, Amar Aryan via Mesa-users <mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
>
> Dear mesa user,
>
> MESA_VERSION : mesa-r22.05.1
> OS : Ubuntu 20.04
>
> I am trying to evolve a heavily rotating 25 M_sun ZAMS star up to the stage of core-collapse by setting new_omega_div_omega_crit = 1.0 in inlist_mass_Z_wind_rotation. The model could successfully evolve up to the desired stage. Just to check if the rotation has been implemented correctly or not, I plotted "surf_avg_omega_div_omega_crit" against "star_age" when the run has finished inlist_to_zams. From the attached plot, I could see that the "surf_avg_omega_div_omega_crit'' has almost never touched the value of 1.0!
> <rotation.png>
>
> So, I am just wondering if the rotation has been correctly employed in the model or not. Also, Is it because the "surf_avg_omega_div_omega_crit" represent the average value of "omega_div_omega_crit" at the surface? I am using satisfactory temporal and spatial resolution by setting : time_delta_coeff = 0.8, varcontrol_target = 1d-3, mesh_delta_coeff = 0.7, and mesh_delta_coeff_for_highT = 0.9.
>
> Please provide your suggestion.
>
> With regards,
> Amar
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
>
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list