[Mesa-users] rel_run_E_err Warning

[Bill Paxton]

> On May 7, 2020, at 6:11 PM, Jennifer Van Saders <vansaders at astronomy.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for this email - this really helps me to understand a bit better what this is actually telling me, although it's taken some time to process it. The thing that's still a bit surprising to me is that this is a very solar star - solar mass, solar composition, solar age. Gold tolerances are on. I wouldn't have thought we're in particularly ugly regions for the EOS, or any of the other input physics... but perhaps I haven't appreciated the lack of precision, even at solar conditions. 

Please send enough (inlists etc) so that I can poke into the details to see if I can find out why it is not able to keep rel_run_E_err down.   I’m also curious about what could be going on if what seems like a vanilla situation.

> 
> I'll be sure to respond to this thread if we arrive at a solution that is anything other than living with it... but don't expect any beautiful new input tables ;) 
> 

darn, i was hoping you’d make a small detour in your career to solve the eos problems and the opacity problems and all the rest.  ;-)

b


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20200507/ee277bd2/attachment.htm>