[Mesa-users] resolution study

[Francis Timmes]

> I figured out where I remembered seeing such materials. In our Simulating Stars Summer School in China last year, Manos's minilab 1 provides information on the topic (http://www.stellar-astrophysics.org/material.html).

ahh, thanks amber.
don't forget dq_max!

fxt




> On Mar 11, 2019, at 9:28 AM, amber lauer via Mesa-users <mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
> 
> Hey, guys, not sure what ideological debate I've stumbled into here, I think it's a bit over my head.
> 
> Obviously simplifying the mesh is not my ideal scenario, but I'm planning on running a grid of many ~1000 models and am trying to make use of local (free) resources as best I can in order to prove I have a useful idea. But, even with my reduced mesh, I'm fairly confident that it will be an improvement on previous work, and therefore is still useful, albeit with a full explanation of limitations and assumptions. 
> 
> I would echo the statement about "all models are wrong, some are useful".
> 
> Thanks to Aaron and Frank, I will make use of your information. For those also seeking this information, I figured out where I remembered seeing such materials. In our Simulating Stars Summer School in China last year, Manos's minilab 1 provides information on the topic (http://www.stellar-astrophysics.org/material.html).
> 
> Thanks all.