[Mesa-users] Models failing to reach core collapse
Dan Patnaude
dpatnaude at cfa.harvard.edu
Wed Jan 30 19:37:48 EST 2019
Hi Bill-
Thanks! Yes, I can get the presn cc test case to collapse as well. It's a
very unsatisfying solution though, as the inlists we used in our 2017 paper
worked just fine. I don't think I'm trying to reinvent the wheel, but
rather reproduce that which worked for me in the past. In any event, we
will work with these inlists to get where we want to go.
Thanks for all the help!
-Dan
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:10 AM Francis Timmes <fxt44 at mac.com> wrote:
> hi dan,
>
> inlist_control was strangely truncated in the zip file.
> the zip file has been replaced and matches what is on the dropbox site.
>
> thanks for bringing this to our attention.
>
> fxt
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 27, 2019, at 5:29 PM, Francis Timmes <fxt44 at mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > hi dan,
> >
> > thanks. rob and i will straighten this out.
> >
> > fxt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 27, 2019, at 5:23 PM, Dan Patnaude <dpatnaude at cfa.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Frank-
> >>
> >> The dropbox link is in the 2nd column of the marketplace table:
> >>
> >> Rob Farmer "On Variations Of Pre-Supernova Model Properties". Model
> files, inlists, run_star_extras, and nuclear networks at here. Read
> 7624 Get
> >>
> >>
> >> maybe Rob provided them?
> >>
> >> -Dan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 7:18 PM Francis Timmes <fxt44 at mac.com> wrote:
> >> where is the dropbox link coming from?
> >>
> >> fxt
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jan 27, 2019, at 4:59 PM, Dan Patnaude via Mesa-users <
> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rob-
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for pointing this out. There are two things to point out here,
> one related to the mesa marketplace, and another related to the inlists.
> >>>
> >>> 1: On the mesa marketplace (
> http://cococubed.asu.edu/mesa_market/inlists.html), the inlists from your
> paper linked here (
> http://cococubed.asu.edu/mesa_market/ewExternalFiles/Variations_rf.zip ,
> under the "Get" URL) vs those linked through the
> >>> dropbox
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yclyf0fv7az8eya/AAAUeaqJYLeBYb0-CXeZ82Kza?dl=0
> are not the same. The dropbox files are consistent with what are in your
> paper and what you suggest. The "marketplace" inlists don't mention
> overshoot and don't set the Ledoux criteria to true. This probably needs to
> be fixed by the MESA folks.
> >>>
> >>> 2: Even with using the appropriate inlists, Taylor and I are still
> unable to get the 15M core to collapse. I don't think this is related to
> "islands of explodability," as these are the exact same inlists I used in
> my 2017 paper, version 7624, where I was able to get a core to collapse
> just fine.
> >>>
> >>> So I guess the 1st question is, have you been able to reproduce some
> of your results using the latest stable release of MESA? Perhaps if you
> have the time, you can work with us to iron out the issues.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:44 AM Rob Farmer <r.j.farmer at uva.nl> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I see you've removed overshoot from your models. I find that having
> even a little bit of overshoot usually helps mesa evolve a model more
> efficiently, as it smooths the composition boundaries. Also you've removed
> the use_Ledoux_criterion=.true. so your using the default
> use_Ledoux_criterion=.false. which means schwarzschild convection
> boundaries. Again i've found ledoux to make the evolution easier (but this
> depends on what physics you want to test, if you want to change it)
> >>>
> >>> The other thing to do is work out what is happening inside the star
> that is causing problems. Kippenhan/abundance profile/mixing profile plots
> can help here to see how the burning/mixing is behaving and if it seems to
> get stuck somewhere particular (core burning? shell burning? which fuel?)
> which can help refine what you need to change to get the model working.
> >>>
> >>> I'd also look at what is limiting the timetsep. This is given by the
> string in the last entry of the terminal output for a step (called
> dt_limit). That limit can then be compared to the names here
> http://mesa.sourceforge.net/controls_defaults.html#timestep_controls and
> that will give you the timestep control that is currently limiting your
> evolution.
> >>>
> >>> Rob
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 05:42, Jamie Tayar <jtayar at hawaii.edu> wrote:
> >>> Hi Taylor,
> >>> This isn't really my area of expertise, so I'll let someone else
> comment on the details of your models, but 15 solar masses is right around
> where the 'islands of explodability' start to show up (e.g. Figure 5 of
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05956 or Figure 8 of
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.03243.pdf), and some fraction of models never
> reach the sort of compactness that indicates a successful collapse, so
> there's a possibility that what you're seeing is physics and not numerics.
> >>> Apologies if you've already thought of that,
> >>> Jamie
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:25 PM Taylor Jacovich via Mesa-users <
> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> Have run into an issue with the current version of MESA where stars
> with a specific mass will never reach core-collapse (fe_core_infall >
> 10**3km/s stopping condition). A full description of the issue and all the
> model data can be found here: https://gitlab.com/wind-loss-testing/readme
> .
> >>>
> >>> The reader’s digest version is that stars with a certain mass (eg.
> 15.0Msun) will get stuck at a sub-Chandrasekhar mass iron core and happily
> coast for weeks at a time. Meanwhile masses directly around the ones that
> fail to collapse (eg. 14.9Msun and 15.1Msun) will collapse without fail.
> We are using Farmer’s inlists that were designed to help with
> explodability, and the only parameter we change between runs is the mass.
> >>> Any suggestions on new parameters to try or other options that may
> relieve the issue are much appreciated. Inlists are attached below, or you
> can clone from this directory
> https://gitlab.com/wind-loss-testing/windloss-template to have an
> identical experience.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Taylor Jacovich
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
> >>> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
> >>> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
> >>> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20190130/f6286659/attachment.html>
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list