[Mesa-users] MESA installation data folder

Rob Farmer r.j.farmer at uva.nl
Sat Mar 31 07:33:38 EDT 2018


There are some easy steps to remove unneeded files from mesa:

rm -rf data/*/cache/*  # > 1gb
You can also set use_cache=.false. in star/private/star/private_def.f90 to
turn of making cache files at all

Lots if stuff we don't need after installation:
rm -rf */{*.tar.*,*.txz,*.tbz} # 2gb
rm -rf .svn #2.5gb
rm -rf */make/* #62mb
rm -rf *.rb # small
rm -rf */data #small
rm -rf eos/*_builder #200mb
rm -rf */preprocessor #64mb

thats at least ~5.5Gb saving

Rob


On 31 March 2018 at 06:11, amber lauer via Mesa-users <
mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:

> Evan, have you updated the docker container to the newest version? If so
> what effects has this had on the size of the container? I'm just thinking
> about distribution considerations.
>
> Maybe there's a way to hold off on populating the tables until the end
> user installs the VM/container. I'll have to see how small I can compress
> the VM once it's complete, to see if I need to pursue this option.
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 10:42 PM Evan Bauer <ebauer at physics.ucsb.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Amber,
>>
>> Yes, I believe this is normal. Most of the size increase is due to the
>> extensive new EOS tables that are shipped for the PTEH and ELM options, as
>> you can see from the eosDT_data entry that you posted.
>>
>> Evan
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 30, 2018, at 7:06 PM, Francis Timmes via Mesa-users <
>> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> My total folder size is ~18gb now, FYI.
>> >> Is this normal?
>> >
>> > yes. mine is ~20gb but i have some cache stuff in there.
>> > maybe go to 50gb on the virtual to allow room to run?
>> >
>> > fxt
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Mar 30, 2018, at 6:47 PM, amber lauer via Mesa-users <
>> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> My total folder size is ~18gb now, FYI. I just redownloaded it and
>> compiled again as a test with the same result.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:46 PM, amber lauer <
>> amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu> wrote:
>> >> Looking back at version 9793 I see that the entire installation takes
>> about 5.7gb. I recently upgraded to 10398 via svn (the folder is about 2gb
>> larger via this method than downloading the zip, but it's way quicker).
>> >>
>> >> Here's an output of the folder sizes for /mesa/data:
>> >>
>> >> 64K  ./rates_data/rate_tables
>> >> 21M  ./rates_data/suzuki
>> >> 175M ./rates_data/cache
>> >> 250M ./rates_data
>> >> 20M  ./star_data/zams_models
>> >> 18M  ./star_data/white_dwarf_models
>> >> 76K  ./star_data/plot_info
>> >> 4.0K ./star_data/planet_models_without_cores
>> >> 4.0K ./star_data/planet_models_with_inert_cores
>> >> 2.0M ./star_data/very_low_mass_grey_models
>> >> 2.0M ./star_data/very_low_mass_COND_tau100_models
>> >> 392K ./star_data/very_low_mass_COND_tau1_models
>> >> 44M  ./star_data
>> >> 332K ./net_data/nets
>> >> 340K ./net_data
>> >> 2.8M ./chem_data
>> >> 760K ./colors_data
>> >> 2.7G ./eosDT_data/cache
>> >> 12G  ./eosDT_data
>> >> 283M ./eosPT_data/cache
>> >> 525M ./eosPT_data
>> >> 53M  ./kap_data/cache
>> >> 491M ./kap_data
>> >> 336M ./ionization_data/cache
>> >> 431M ./ionization_data
>> >> 1.1M ./atm_data
>> >>
>> >> Is this normal? I specifically ask this because I'll have to redo the
>> VMESA virtual machine because I only designed it to have a 20gb hdd.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Amber Lauer
>> >> Postdoctoral Researcher
>> >> Triangle University Nuclear Lab
>> >> Duke University
>> >> amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Amber Lauer
>> >> Postdoctoral Researcher
>> >> Triangle University Nuclear Lab
>> >> Duke University
>> >> amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
>> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
>> mesastar.org_mailman_listinfo_mesa-2Dusers&d=DwIFAg&c=
>> imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=IZ3U2LUL6yhDK-
>> Uf8F_eU9W85o61MM43boq-nVwHt38&m=Y1h3ERzFuyyrZqMVfSZPPnKHjrPius
>> 4xaR6YFeyZo70&s=mLeh8MfbUIA3a_yzaiuqc8Cnrf69TAPIK7iocZaNqVk&e=
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
>> mesastar.org_mailman_listinfo_mesa-2Dusers&d=DwIFAg&c=
>> imBPVzF25OnBgGmVOlcsiEgHoG1i6YHLR0Sj_gZ4adc&r=IZ3U2LUL6yhDK-
>> Uf8F_eU9W85o61MM43boq-nVwHt38&m=Y1h3ERzFuyyrZqMVfSZPPnKHjrPius
>> 4xaR6YFeyZo70&s=mLeh8MfbUIA3a_yzaiuqc8Cnrf69TAPIK7iocZaNqVk&e=
>> >
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20180331/0ed85bec/attachment.html>


More information about the Mesa-users mailing list