[Mesa-users] MESA installation data folder

amber lauer amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu
Fri Mar 30 21:46:11 EDT 2018


Looking back at version 9793 I see that the entire installation takes about
5.7gb. I recently upgraded to 10398 via svn (the folder is about 2gb larger
via this method than downloading the zip, but it's way quicker).

Here's an output of the folder sizes for /mesa/data:

*64K ./rates_data/rate_tables*
*21M ./rates_data/suzuki*
*175M ./rates_data/cache*
*250M ./rates_data*
*20M ./star_data/zams_models*
*18M ./star_data/white_dwarf_models*
*76K ./star_data/plot_info*
*4.0K ./star_data/planet_models_without_cores*
*4.0K ./star_data/planet_models_with_inert_cores*
*2.0M ./star_data/very_low_mass_grey_models*
*2.0M ./star_data/very_low_mass_COND_tau100_models*
*392K ./star_data/very_low_mass_COND_tau1_models*
*44M ./star_data*
*332K ./net_data/nets*
*340K ./net_data*
*2.8M ./chem_data*
*760K ./colors_data*
*2.7G ./eosDT_data/cache*
*12G ./eosDT_data*
*283M ./eosPT_data/cache*
*525M ./eosPT_data*
*53M ./kap_data/cache*
*491M ./kap_data*
*336M ./ionization_data/cache*
*431M ./ionization_data*
*1.1M ./atm_data*

Is this normal? I specifically ask this because I'll have to redo the VMESA
virtual machine because I only designed it to have a 20gb hdd.

-- 
Amber Lauer
Postdoctoral Researcher
Triangle University Nuclear Lab
Duke University
amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu <amber.lauer at duke.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20180330/6f2b301e/attachment.html>


More information about the Mesa-users mailing list