[Mesa-users] network mismatch

[Meisel, Zach]

Hi Amber,

You can search the archive of the mailing list here: https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/

I think the answer to your question from the last time is here: https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/2017-February/007476.html

-Zach

----
Zach Meisel
Asst. Prof. of Physics & Astronomy
Ohio University
Email: meisel at ohio.edu
Web: http://inpp.ohiou.edu/~meisel

________________________________
From: Mesa-users <mesa-users-bounces at lists.mesastar.org> on behalf of amber lauer via Mesa-users <mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 3:31:29 PM
To: MESA Users List
Subject: [Mesa-users] network mismatch

Hello guys, part of this question has been asked previously (by me) but I believe it was during the previous mailing list and I'm not sure how to search those archives.

I'm writing to ask about mismatch between isotopes included in a model vs the chosen network. I know that in one of the two cases they are reassigned to solar. How about the other?

What I mean is, if a model includes more isotopes than the net, what happens to the abundances of those that are removed from the model? If a net includes more isotopes than the model, how are the missing isotopes assigned (if at all)? I looked at adjust_net.f90 and adjust_xyz.f90, but I don't think these are exactly the cases I'm looking for. Thanks as always.

--
Amber Lauer
Postdoctoral Researcher
Triangle Universities Nuclear Lab
Duke University
amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu<mailto:amber.lauer at duke.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20180724/4cc9ad94/attachment.html>