[Mesa-users] network mismatch

[amber lauer]

My goodness, it indeed sent it to spam. That's weird, I generally have no
trouble receiving the mailing list emails.

I realized after asking my question that of course the capability would
logically be added, I was just following up for the benefit of anyone who
was new to MESA or the list.

I was able to answer my own question by searching the list, and perhaps it
would have been appropriate to follow up with that information as well! But
now you all have done that for me, so thank you very much as always. The
mailing list is a great resource.


On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:04 AM Rob Farmer <r.j.farmer at uva.nl> wrote:

> At the bottom of every email sent by the new mailing list, there is a link
> to the mailing list homepage:
>
> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
>
> That page contains a link for searching the mesa-user archives.
>
> >Just to follow up, in case someone saw my question, it is possible to
> search the mailing list archives here
>
> It appears you may of missed the email by Zach Meisel on the 24 of july,
> check your spam folder as gmail had unfortunately categorized it as spam
> for me, his message is here:
>
> https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/2018-July/009237.html
>
>
> Rob
>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 19:37, amber lauer via Mesa-users <
> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org> wrote:
>
>> Just to follow up, in case someone saw my question, it is possible to
>> search the mailing list archives here:
>>
>> https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/
>>
>> I last inquired about this capability at the 2017 summer school, which
>> was right around the time of the changover to the new mail server. I
>> believe that capability hadn't been added yet. Thanks.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 3:31 PM amber lauer <amberlauer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello guys, part of this question has been asked previously (by me) but
>>> I believe it was during the previous mailing list and I'm not sure how to
>>> search those archives.
>>>
>>> I'm writing to ask about mismatch between isotopes included in a model
>>> vs the chosen network. I know that in one of the two cases they are
>>> reassigned to solar. How about the other?
>>>
>>> What I mean is, if a model includes more isotopes than the net, what
>>> happens to the abundances of those that are removed from the model? If a
>>> net includes more isotopes than the model, how are the missing isotopes
>>> assigned (if at all)? I looked at adjust_net.f90 and adjust_xyz.f90, but I
>>> don't think these are exactly the cases I'm looking for. Thanks as always.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Amber Lauer
>>> Postdoctoral Researcher
>>> Triangle Universities Nuclear Lab
>>> Duke University
>>> amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu <amber.lauer at duke.edu>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Amber Lauer
>> Postdoctoral Researcher
>> Triangle Universities Nuclear Lab
>> Duke University
>> amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu <amber.lauer at duke.edu>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-users at lists.mesastar.org
>> https://lists.mesastar.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-users
>>
>>

-- 
Amber Lauer
Postdoctoral Researcher
Triangle Universities Nuclear Lab
Duke University
amber.lauer at tunl.duke.edu <amber.lauer at duke.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20180814/e52fa7f3/attachment.html>