[mesa-users] TP-AGB and Post-AGB Mass Loss Issues
Francis Timmes
fxt44 at mac.com
Thu Feb 11 20:42:36 EST 2016
many of your questions could be answered by
you studying the source code. have you looked?
fxt
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Ian Foley <ifoley2008 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As part of my personal education of Stellar Evolution, I have been
> running the 1M pre ms to wd test suite case up to 9M and trying out
> and learning about the inlist.
>
> The big issue I see is to understand how mass loss is applied and its
> relationship to the thermal pulses.
>
> Very evident is that if I increase the RGB and AGB scaling factors ( I
> have tried from 0.1 up to 8) it flattens out and reduces the number of
> thermal pules I suspect this is because as we increase the mass loss
> via the mass loss formulae, the larger and more frequent TP's are not
> needed to remove the mass.
>
> This has led me to try to find answers to the following questions.
>
> 1. Is the mass loss formula applied to every zone to compute the loss?
> If yes, why isn't mass loss calculated by using the radial velocity
> and computing the amount of matter expelled through the star's outer
> zone. If no, how is the formula applied?
>
> 2. Is the mass loss formula applied only to H? Or is it applied to He
> and others as well?
>
> 3. I have been primarily using the Reimer and Blocker mass loss
> formula which is I think a heuristic formula determined by
> experimental observations. However, it does seem to be applied fairly
> independently of the actual stellar evolution equations. Since we
> don't know very well from experiment the number and scale of the TP's
> how can we know what is a good scaling factor to use.
>
> 4. In relation to the new solar wind additions in r8118 over r7624
> it's not quite clear to me what is the relation between the Reimer and
> Blocker terms and turning on and off the the cool wind dependent on
> temperature. Are the Reimer and Blocker factors still needed and the
> cool wind temperature terms just configure when they are activated?
>
> 5. I have similar issues with the convection overshooting. Although it
> seems likely to be important it seems we have no idea of the
> appropriate number to apply. And, like mass loss, the bigger the
> factors you choose the more it dampens the TP's.
>
> 6. How is the mass loss formula's applied in the post-AGB phase? Does
> the Blocker term just switch off at some point and if so when? Why
> does it seem that there is no He loss in the post-AGB phase?
>
> 7. I find it very strange that in the post-AGB phase the lg_LH term in
> the terminal output is still up close to the total lg_L even when
> there is almost no hydrogen left and what hydrogen there is in the
> outer zones of the envelope.
>
> step lg_Tcntr Teff lg_LH lg_Lnuc Mass
> H_rich
> H_cntr N_cntr Y_surf X_avg eta_cntr zones retry
> lg_dt_yr lg_Dcntr lg_R lg_L3a lg_Lneu lg_Mdot
> He_core He_cntr O_cntr Z_surf Y_avg gam_cntr iters
> bckup
> age_yr lg_Pcntr lg_L lg_LZ lg_Psurf lg_Dsurf
> C_core
> C_cntr Ne_cntr Z_cntr Z_avg v_div_cs dt_limit
>
> 39400 8.211499 2.889E+04 4.255626 4.354482 0.985786
> 0.000116 0.000000 0.000000 0.374091 0.000065 49.353686 2183
> 5037
> -5.801543 7.277248 0.753659 3.545685 3.889458 -4.012795
> 0.985670 0.000000 0.579524 0.020125 0.001666 7.754729 6
> 31
> 3.5571E+07 24.321104 4.303656 3.038122 3.281056 -10.342147
> 0.982096 0.394597 0.001949 1.000E+00 9.983E-01 0.000E+00
> varcontrol
>
> Is this OK or is there a problem with the software?
>
>
> I would be very grateful for any help in answer to these questions
> Ian
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list