[mesa-users] MESA3 paper 6_massive_binary

[Willie Strickland]

Here is the final result I got for the massive_binary.  Also sounds like same as yours.

	My run finished at step 6429, age 1.137e7, 2.788 mass1, 26.07 mass2.

	stop because have dropped below central lower limit for c12

It took 25,926 steps.  I got an 

     >>>>>>> EXCESSIVE runtime        187.087300          1.000000   <<<<<<<<<  ERROR

Willie




> On Jun 15, 2015, at 7:49 AM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com <mailto:roni181066 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Pablo,
> 
> Oops... right, I put the file in the wrong place.
> Rerunning, and let's see what happens.
> 
> I also ran the rotating binary example.
> Ended up with donor mass 2.45 Msun and accretor reaching Roche-lobe.
> Does that sound right?
> 
> Thanks,
> Roni
> 
> ‫בתאריך יום ב׳, 15 ביוני 2015 ב-14:11 מאת ‪Pablo Marchant‬‏ <‪pamarca at gmail.com <mailto:pamarca at gmail.com>‬‏>:‬
> Roni, together with the inlists there is a run_star_extras.f provided (and in the inlists it is said that you need it). Are you using it? From you output it seems not. This implements the switch from a Kudritski wind to a Hamann one as described in Wellstein & Langer 1999.
> 
> I guess changing this will make it consistent with that of the paper. Your model is doing some crazy things though.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com <mailto:roni181066 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
> Too big for one email, will send several.
> Thanks,
> Roni
> 
> ‫בתאריך יום א׳, 14 ביוני 2015 ב-22:55 מאת ‪Pablo Marchant‬‏ <‪pamarca at gmail.com <mailto:pamarca at gmail.com>‬‏>:‬
> Roni, can you send me your history.data for each star and binary_history.data to compare?
> 
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com <mailto:roni181066 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I downloaded the inlists of the MESA3 paper, and ran the example 6_massive_binary, without changing anything in the inlists or the code, version 7624.
> The run ends with the donor having 2Msun, the accretor filling its Roche-lobe, and the time steps being super small (1e-12).
> This not what seems to happen in the paper.
> Am I doing anything wrong?
> 
> Roni
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pablo Marchant Campos
> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pablo Marchant Campos
> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20150615/840b868e/attachment.html>