[mesa-users] MESA3 paper 7_binary_with_rot
Willie Strickland
cwskas at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 11:59:15 EDT 2015
Did you get a lot of w > w_crit lines in the rotating one? I got the same results as you it sounds like, but had all these redo lines.
8,821 lines fix w > w_crit: bisect mdots and redo
89 lines w > w_crit: revise mdot and redo
My run finished at step 6429, age 1.254e7, 2.45 mass1, 18.7 mass2.
accretor photosphere has reached its Roche Lobe
accretor (r-rl)/rl 6429 5.0151227593021562D-02
Willie
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 7:49 AM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
> Oops... right, I put the file in the wrong place.
> Rerunning, and let's see what happens.
>
> I also ran the rotating binary example.
> Ended up with donor mass 2.45 Msun and accretor reaching Roche-lobe.
> Does that sound right?
>
> Thanks,
> Roni
>
> בתאריך יום ב׳, 15 ביוני 2015 ב-14:11 מאת Pablo Marchant <pamarca at gmail.com <mailto:pamarca at gmail.com>>:
> Roni, together with the inlists there is a run_star_extras.f provided (and in the inlists it is said that you need it). Are you using it? From you output it seems not. This implements the switch from a Kudritski wind to a Hamann one as described in Wellstein & Langer 1999.
>
> I guess changing this will make it consistent with that of the paper. Your model is doing some crazy things though.
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com <mailto:roni181066 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
> Too big for one email, will send several.
> Thanks,
> Roni
>
> בתאריך יום א׳, 14 ביוני 2015 ב-22:55 מאת Pablo Marchant <pamarca at gmail.com <mailto:pamarca at gmail.com>>:
> Roni, can you send me your history.data for each star and binary_history.data to compare?
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com <mailto:roni181066 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded the inlists of the MESA3 paper, and ran the example 6_massive_binary, without changing anything in the inlists or the code, version 7624.
> The run ends with the donor having 2Msun, the accretor filling its Roche-lobe, and the time steps being super small (1e-12).
> This not what seems to happen in the paper.
> Am I doing anything wrong?
>
> Roni
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Pablo Marchant Campos
> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>
>
>
> --
> Pablo Marchant Campos
> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20150615/f84a6386/attachment.html>
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list