[mesa-users] MESA3 paper massive binary example

Roni Waldman roni181066 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 09:07:45 EDT 2015


I see.
So which is the more efficient tide option, and how do I activate it?

‫בתאריך יום ב׳, 15 ביוני 2015 ב-16:02 מאת ‪Pablo Marchant‬‏ <‪
pamarca at gmail.com‬‏>:‬

> Yes, that's the end point of the evolution for the case that uses the
> dynamical tide as in Hurley et al. 2002. As it accretes much less material
> than in conservative evolution, it evolves toward the giant branch instead
> of staying blue and evolution is terminated at RLOF of the secondary (it
> would likely become dynamically unstable too, owing to the extreme q). The
> model that uses the more efficient tide becomes a blue supergiant so you
> don't have the accretor overfilling its Roche lobe.
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pablo,
>>
>> Oops... right, I put the file in the wrong place.
>> Rerunning, and let's see what happens.
>>
>> I also ran the rotating binary example.
>> Ended up with donor mass 2.45 Msun and accretor reaching Roche-lobe.
>> Does that sound right?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roni
>>
>> ‫בתאריך יום ב׳, 15 ביוני 2015 ב-14:11 מאת ‪Pablo Marchant‬‏ <‪
>> pamarca at gmail.com‬‏>:‬
>>
>>> Roni, together with the inlists there is a run_star_extras.f provided
>>> (and in the inlists it is said that you need it). Are you using it? From
>>> you output it seems not. This implements the switch from a Kudritski wind
>>> to a Hamann one as described in Wellstein & Langer 1999.
>>>
>>> I guess changing this will make it consistent with that of the paper.
>>> Your model is doing some crazy things though.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Pablo,
>>>> Too big for one email, will send several.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Roni
>>>>
>>>> ‫בתאריך יום א׳, 14 ביוני 2015 ב-22:55 מאת ‪Pablo Marchant‬‏ <‪
>>>> pamarca at gmail.com‬‏>:‬
>>>>
>>>>> Roni, can you send me your history.data for each star and
>>>>> binary_history.data to compare?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I downloaded the inlists of the MESA3 paper, and ran the example
>>>>>> 6_massive_binary, without changing anything in the inlists or the code,
>>>>>> version 7624.
>>>>>> The run ends with the donor having 2Msun, the accretor filling its
>>>>>> Roche-lobe, and the time steps being super small (1e-12).
>>>>>> This not what seems to happen in the paper.
>>>>>> Am I doing anything wrong?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Roni
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mesa-users mailing list
>>>>>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pablo Marchant Campos
>>>>> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
>>>>> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Pablo Marchant Campos
>>> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
>>> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pablo Marchant Campos
> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20150615/3785b1b6/attachment.html>


More information about the Mesa-users mailing list