[mesa-users] MESA3 paper massive binary example

[Pablo Marchant]

Yes, that's the end point of the evolution for the case that uses the
dynamical tide as in Hurley et al. 2002. As it accretes much less material
than in conservative evolution, it evolves toward the giant branch instead
of staying blue and evolution is terminated at RLOF of the secondary (it
would likely become dynamically unstable too, owing to the extreme q). The
model that uses the more efficient tide becomes a blue supergiant so you
don't have the accretor overfilling its Roche lobe.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pablo,
>
> Oops... right, I put the file in the wrong place.
> Rerunning, and let's see what happens.
>
> I also ran the rotating binary example.
> Ended up with donor mass 2.45 Msun and accretor reaching Roche-lobe.
> Does that sound right?
>
> Thanks,
> Roni
>
> ‫בתאריך יום ב׳, 15 ביוני 2015 ב-14:11 מאת ‪Pablo Marchant‬‏ <‪
> pamarca at gmail.com‬‏>:‬
>
>> Roni, together with the inlists there is a run_star_extras.f provided
>> (and in the inlists it is said that you need it). Are you using it? From
>> you output it seems not. This implements the switch from a Kudritski wind
>> to a Hamann one as described in Wellstein & Langer 1999.
>>
>> I guess changing this will make it consistent with that of the paper.
>> Your model is doing some crazy things though.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pablo,
>>> Too big for one email, will send several.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roni
>>>
>>> ‫בתאריך יום א׳, 14 ביוני 2015 ב-22:55 מאת ‪Pablo Marchant‬‏ <‪
>>> pamarca at gmail.com‬‏>:‬
>>>
>>>> Roni, can you send me your history.data for each star and
>>>> binary_history.data to compare?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I downloaded the inlists of the MESA3 paper, and ran the example
>>>>> 6_massive_binary, without changing anything in the inlists or the code,
>>>>> version 7624.
>>>>> The run ends with the donor having 2Msun, the accretor filling its
>>>>> Roche-lobe, and the time steps being super small (1e-12).
>>>>> This not what seems to happen in the paper.
>>>>> Am I doing anything wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Roni
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mesa-users mailing list
>>>>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Pablo Marchant Campos
>>>> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
>>>> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pablo Marchant Campos
>> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
>> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>>
>


-- 
Pablo Marchant Campos
M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20150615/ce93a6d5/attachment.html>