[mesa-users] Vink_wind_eta

[Grant Newsham]

Since we are getting our thesauruses out - I say prescription.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Matteo Cantiello <cantiel at kitp.ucsb.edu>
wrote:

> At low T the Mdot values are mostly derived from observations, with little
> or no physical modeling available. So "scheme" sounds better to me.
> -M
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Falk Herwig <fherwig at uvic.ca> wrote:
>
> “scheme" is good, alternatively, to me these things are “models” - it is a
> model of mass loss,
> not a simulation or just fitting of experimental data. instead these
> formulae
> are most often an observational data guided parameterization of low-order
> versions
> of the real physics. To me these are mass loss models.
>
>  F.
>     --
> Falk Herwig
> Dept of Physics & Astronomy, U of Victoria
> fherwig at uvic.ca, tel: +1 (250) 721-7743
>
>
>
>  On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Bill Paxton <paxton at kitp.ucsb.edu> wrote:
>
>
>  On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Falk Herwig wrote:
>
> I am not sure I like the "recipe" in the parameter names.
>
>
> how about keeping "scheme" instead?  or do you have an alternative in mind?
>
>  -b
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20150605/89e83620/attachment.html>