[mesa-users] Inconsistency in figure 2 from mesa paper III

[Josiah W. Schwab]

Yes, 7624 misreporting as 7623is a known issue.  It is cosmetic only.

Josiah

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Pablo Marchant <pamarca at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think 7624 wrongly identifies itself as 7623 (version number is saved in
> plain text in data/version_number). I'll re-check this run to see what
> comes out of it.
>
> Cheers!
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ying Qin <Ying.Qin at unige.ch> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Pablo,
>>
>>  Thanks for your reply!
>>
>>  Yes, Kolb curves is different.
>> I made a local copy of $MESA_DIR/binary/work, compile it (./clean &&
>> ./mk) and copy  inlist1 and inlist_project there (inlist2 is unused).
>>  To switch between the Ritter and Kolb schemes modify mdot_scheme in the
>> binary_controls section of inlist_project
>>
>>  And nothing else is changed in my work directory. I have been producing
>> other examples and just saved the history.data file and corresponding
>> inlist files.
>> In addition, When I got the history.data,  it says that this is r7623
>> version, but I installed the version of r7624. I don’t know whether it is
>> the reason or not ?
>>
>>
>>  With my best regards,
>> Ying
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:23, Pablo Marchant <pamarca at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Ying. Could you send me a full copy of the directory you used to run
>> this model, just to be sure there is nothing different? In principle
>> results should be the same, but note anyhow that the difference is not that
>> important. That additional phase of mass transfer only takes from the donor
>> a very small amount of mass, both in comparison to the previous phase of
>> mass transfer and to the remaining mass above the helium core.
>>
>>  Curiously, the Ritter curve looks pretty much like the one in the
>> paper, it's the Kolb curve that disagrees.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Ying Qin <Ying.Qin at unige.ch> wrote:
>>
>>  Dear all,
>>
>>  I have recently being trying to reproduce the examples of Section
>> 2(Binaries) of the recent mesa paper, using the inlists_mesa3 files posted
>> on mesastar.org site. Based on the requirements, I changed my mesa
>> version to r7624.
>>
>>  However, for figure 2 of the paper (my result is in the attached file),
>> if you focus on the panel 4(lower right), and you can easily find that
>> there is an inconsistency between my results and the result from paper.
>>
>>  I cannot figure out what the reason for the inconsistency is, as I did
>> not change the provided inlist1 and inlist_project.
>> Any comments are welcome. Thanks for your help in advance.
>>
>>  With my best regards,
>> Ying
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-users mailing list
>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Pablo Marchant Campos
>> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
>> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pablo Marchant Campos
> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20150727/4f185e74/attachment.html>