[mesa-users] Eddington Limit
Josiah Schwab
jwschwab at berkeley.edu
Mon Dec 7 15:16:44 EST 2015
Hi Kenny,
> I was going through the code to try and set a different maximum mdot_edd
> and I noticed inside of binary_mdot.f90 that mdot_edd seems to be defined
> oddly
>
> if (.not. b% use_es_opacity_for_mdot_edd) then
> mdot_edd = 4*pi*b% s1% cgrav(1)*b% m(b% a_i)/(clight*b% s1%
> opacity(1))
> else
> mdot_edd = 4*pi*b% s1% cgrav(1)*b% m(b% a_i)/(clight*0.2*(1+b%
> s1% surface_h1))
>
> Which seem to correspond to:
>
> Mdot = 4 pi G M / (c K)
>
> and
>
> Mdot = 4 pi G M / (c (1 + X))
>
> Is this equivalent to the normal representation of
>
> Mdot = 4 pi c R / K?
>
> While the units appear to match, I would assume that the two are not
> necessarily equivalent. Unless I'm misunderstanding the code here. Does
> anyone have some insight to this?
Well, it is equivalent if you set R = GM/c^2. :)
There's not a universally useful definition of Mdot_edd, given that MESA
can evolve both point mass and non-point mass companions.
Users should make use of the other_mdot_edd hook and define the Mdot_edd
that is appropriate for your problem.
You may be interested to look at Sterl Phinney's labs from the most
recent MESA summer school.
http://mesastar.org/teaching-materials/2015-mesa-summer-school/phinney-lecture-2-advanced-mass-transfer-and-binary-extras
Josiah
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list