[mesa-users] The choice of interpolant in interp_1d_lib

[Bill Paxton]

Good!  

-b


On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Ehsan Moravveji wrote:

> Dear Bill, 
> I followed your instructions on interp_1d/test/src/interp_1d_support, and made sure that the interpolation routines, indeed, worked OK.
> Then, I revised my run_star_extras and dropped all “pointer” declaration from my arrays, and that solved the issue. Well, I still wonder where my mistake was, but it is solved now anyway. Now, my opacity profile before and after interpolation just look fine.
> 
> The interpolation routines were innocent, I was the sinner ;-)
> 
> Thanks again for your help.
> Ehsan.
> <comp-interp-before-after.png>
> 
> 
> On Nov 30, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Bill Paxton <paxton at kitp.ucsb.edu> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Nov 30, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Ehsan Moravveji wrote:
>> 
>>> I have tried three approaches, and all of them fail to give me the desired result
>> 
>> please try starting from one of the examples in the test file I mentioned last time.
>> run it to make sure it works as is.
>> then edit the test routine to use your data and redo it.  
>> start by keeping the number of points the same as in the test -- i.e. only use part of your own data for the initial test.
>> so all you are doing is replacing the x and y values in a running example by your values.
>> does that fail too?  if so, it suggests problems in your data.
>> if not, then try changing the number of points to use all of your data.
>> 
>> isn't debugging fun!   
>> 
>> -b
>> 
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20141201/388682de/attachment.html>