[mesa-users] mesa problems with the newly added OP opacity tables for a05 and a09 -- the old OP gs98 tables are fine

Aaron Dotter aaron.dotter at gmail.com
Wed Oct 16 06:32:16 EDT 2013


Hi Ehsan, Radek, Bill,

Let's take this opacity table discussion off-list until it settles down.
 We can come back and close the thread when we're satisfied with the state
of things.

OK?

Aaron


On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Radek Smolec <smolec at camk.edu.pl> wrote:

>
>> Oh boy! The same file for me extends to logT=8.0. So, to avoid confusion,
>> I renamed the file and attached it. I actually did several updates in a row
>> from v.5456 to now 5533. Let me do a fresh checkout, and compare again!
>>
>> What about that. Attached is  gs98_z0m0_x70.data that lived in
> data/kap_data of the 5271 version. I expected the same content as in
> OP_gs98... as I thought the only difference is a new name. But the content
> differs significantly!
> Radek
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
> from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20131016/47e2e9a5/attachment.html>


More information about the Mesa-users mailing list