[mesa-users] mesa release to synch with new MESA SDK release

[Warrick Ball]

D'oh!  Thanks Pablo.  That's me being a twit. I did see the announcements, 
but clearly promptly forgot about them!  Everything is now updating.

Thanks,
W

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, Pablo Marchant wrote:

> Warrick, did you update to the new repo? Sourceforge went through some changes and the address of the mesa repo
> changed:
> http://mesastar.org/documentation/frequently-asked-questions#the-sourceforge-repository-change
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Warrick Ball <wball at astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>       Hi,
>
>       I just tried to update to revision 4849 with
>
>             svn co -r 4849
> 
>
>       and I get the error
>
>       Updating '.':
>       svn: E160006: No such revision 4849
>
>       I tried pinging mesa.svn.sourceforge.net and that worked fine.  I tried updating to the current
>       version and that seemed okay (but might not involve checking anything online).
>
>             svn up -r 4798
>
>       Updating '.':
>       At revision 4798.
>
>       I Googled the error number but didn't find anything useful.
>
>       Cheers,
>       Warrick
> 
>
>       ------------
>       Warrick Ball
>       Postdoc, Institut für Astrophysik Göttingen
>       wball at astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de
>       +49 (0) 551 39 5069
> 
> 
> 
>
>       --
>       Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:48:16 -0700
>       From: Bill Paxton <paxton at kitp.ucsb.edu>
>       To: "mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net [mesa-users at lists.sourceforge"
>       <mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>       Subject: [mesa-users] mesa release to synch with new MESA SDK release
>
>       Hi,
>
>       This new mesa version (4849) has the few small changes to makefile_header required to make it work
>       with the new MESA SDK.
>
>       There is also a fix provided by Josiah Schwab to allow relax composition to work from an arbitrary
>       starting model number rather than only from model number 1.
>
>       We've added control parameters to set lower limits for rotational distortion corrections factors FP
>       and FT.  The old hard-wired limits were 0.6 for each; now the defaults are higher (corresponding to
>       less geometric distortion):
>
>                   FP_min = 0.75
>                   FT_min = 0.95
>
>       I'm working on element diffusion using the beautiful work of Haili Hu and collaborators as a guide.
>       Hopefully this will let us support radiative levitation in a future release, but we already have an
>       option to use atomic diffusion coefficients according to Paquette et al. (1986) instead of assuming
>       pure Coulomb.   The default is still to use pure Coulomb, but you can try using the Paquette coeffs by
>       setting diffusion_use_pure_Coulomb = .false.
>
>       For a preview of where we are headed with element  diffusion, take a look at this 2011 paper
>
>         Haili Hu, C. A. Tout, E. Glebbeek and M.-A. Dupret,
>         "Slowing down atomic diffusion in subdwarf B stars: mass loss or turbulence?",
>         Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 418, 195–205 (2011)
> 
> 
> 
>     [ Part 3.5.2, Application/PDF (Name: "Hu_11.pdf") 2 MB. ]
>     [ Cannot display this part. Press "V" then "S" to save in a file. ]
> 
> 
>     [ Part 3.5.3: "Attached Text" ]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Pablo Marchant Campos
> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de ChilePhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
> 
>


------------
Warrick Ball
Postdoc, Institut für Astrophysik Göttingen
wball at astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de
+49 (0) 551 39 5069