[mesa-users] Inlists for a binary simulation

trobolo dinni trobolo.trobolo.dinni5 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 3 20:44:53 EDT 2013


Hi Pablo,

sorry if I didn't attach my inlists, I forgot to do that :(

I am using the Omega/Omga_crit flag to enable rotation, as I did before
with single star models, but it is not working. Anyway with your setup it
is working, so it is definitely just an issue of how I configured my
rotation flags, I will dig into it!
However, if tides are simulated in Mesa, the two object of the binary
system should undergo some spin-up also without iniital rotation due to the
tides effect, but this is not happening. Can I ask if you know more about
this?


Thanks for the suggestion Pablo, however I am just using the Mesa models as
initial conditions for another code and I don't need to produce a very
realistic star, because it is going to lose resolution when I export it. I
just need something that resembles a stable rotating star under the effect
of tides.

Thanks,
             Roberto



On 3 June 2013 20:24, Pablo Marchant <pamarca at gmail.com> wrote:

> Roberto, I'm not sure what's not working for you. How are you setting the
> star rotation? I just do this:
>
> new_rotation_flag = .true.
> change_rotation_flag = .true.
> set_initial_surface_rotation_v = .true.
> new_surface_rotation_v = 200
>
> in the star_job part of the inlist. If you share your inlists it would be
> easier to see what is going on. For me this works on binaries, but of
> course, as several rotation-related things are missing it does not make
> much sense to deal with rotating stars in my opinion...
>
> The tidal_Q parameter is something I haven't dealt with and don't
> understand that much. It somehow deals with orbital angular momentum loss
> due to tides, but I have no idea how that makes sense as it does not take
> into account rotational velocities or anything. This is on the function
> get_jdot if you want to check, but I guess Bill should know more precisely
> what's going on there.
>
> Cheers!
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:50 AM, trobolo dinni <
> trobolo.trobolo.dinni5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pablo,
>>
>> I have another simple clarification to ask you.
>> I would like to follow the rotation velocity of the two components of the
>> binary system, however I am plotting the rotation frequency Omega in
>> function of the radius but the result is a constant Omega=0.
>>
>> I think that or no rotation is enabled or I am not following the correct
>> parameter in the case of a binary star simulation.
>> How could I enable rotation (I saw a tidal_Q parameter, but if I put it >
>> 0 the simulation crashes!) or what is the right parameter to plot to follow
>> it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>              Roberto
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1 June 2013 02:56, Pablo Marchant <pamarca at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I had made this response to this question directly to Roberto, and to
>>> another email from him relating to restarting a binary model from photos
>>> from individual stellar models. I include it here to mesa-users in case
>>> anyone else finds it useful.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>> #####################################
>>>
>>> Roberto,  right now what you want to do is not possible. You can restart
>>> a binary run with Photos from a binary run,  but not with those of single
>>> stellar evolution. This is because extra orbital data is stored as extra
>>> parameters in the donor, and on top of that,  the code would not respond
>>> properly to receiving two models with different ages. I would expect the
>>> same thing to happen if you used two models saved via inlist.
>>>
>>> You had also asked for an explanation on the use of inlist parameters,
>>> but for now there is no comprehensive default inlist with explanation of
>>> the parameters.  If you have doubts about the use of any, you can ask
>>> individually or check the sources for binary evolution,  which are not too
>>> large.
>>>
>>> And of course,  if you would like to contribute some fixes for any of
>>> these things they would be welcome.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> ###################################
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:38 AM, trobolo dinni <
>>> trobolo.trobolo.dinni5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to ask if there is any place where I can find an
>>>> explanations of the controls for the *&binary_rlo_job* and *
>>>> &rlo_exp_job* control sections (like those present in
>>>> /mesa/star/defaults for *&star_job*, etc), since I can understand just
>>>> in part what is the functions of the parameters available.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>                    Roberto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27 May 2013 21:33, Pablo Marchant <pamarca at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yes, otherwise it will crash due to an I/O error
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:05 AM, trobolo dinni <
>>>>> trobolo.trobolo.dinni5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you very much Pablo, hence Mesa expects to find a file with
>>>>>> that name in the directory I guess?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Roberto
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 May 2013 18:08, Pablo Marchant <pamarca at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roberto, the file inlist_rlo is loaded directly by the subroutine
>>>>>>> rlo_controls, which you can find in star/binary_systems/rlo_routines.inc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:48 AM, trobolo dinni <
>>>>>>> trobolo.trobolo.dinni5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear Mesa users,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to run some binary roche lobe overflow simulations
>>>>>>>> with Mesa, so I started trying to understand how to setup the various
>>>>>>>> inlists taking as example the binary_rlo setup in the test suite.
>>>>>>>> Now, I can see that the files:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *inlist*
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *inlist_binary_rlo*
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *inlist1 *
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *inlist2*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> are linked together, but the file
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *inlist_rlo*
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> is not included in anyone of the previous.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like then to ask how Mesa knows that it has to read it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>                Roberto
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
>>>>>>>> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring
>>>>>>>> service
>>>>>>>> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
>>>>>>>> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt!
>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> mesa-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Pablo Marchant Campos
>>>>>>> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
>>>>>>> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pablo Marchant Campos
>>>>> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
>>>>> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Pablo Marchant Campos
>>> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
>>> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pablo Marchant Campos
> M.Sc on Astrophysics, Universidad Católica de Chile
> PhD student, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20130604/064bdf53/attachment.html>


More information about the Mesa-users mailing list