[mesa-users] Mass-Loss prescriptions

[Falk Herwig]

> de Jager
mass loss is meant for massive stars. For post-AGB the most appropriate would be still the Pauldrach mass loss. One way that helps to avoid trouble in stellar evolution is to ask for solutions that have an equivalent in nature.
Falk.



On 2013-07-25, at 7:48, Brianne Zins <zinsb at allegheny.edu> wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> I am running the 1M_pre_MS_to_WD code in test_suite over a range of various eta values in the mass-loss schemes to compare the output. I have had a great deal of success with the Reimers and Blocker models, but I wanted to try the de Jager mass loss function. Unfortunately, I am unable to achieve convergence post AGB. 
> 
> Any clues what I am doing incorrectly?
> 
> thanks!
> 
> Bri
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users