[mesa-users] Fwd: semiconvection (typo)
Matteo Cantiello
cantiel at kitp.ucsb.edu
Tue Apr 2 03:01:56 EDT 2013
Hi Arlette,
> Hi Tuguldur,
>
> What is the difference in mass extension between convective cores computed with Schwarzschild's and with Ledoux's criterion? The fact that you get too small cores with the Ledoux criterion is not normal. Convective cores should have similar extension with Schwarzschild's and with Ledoux's criterion.
Is it? I thought using just Ledoux should result in general in smaller cores than adopting the Schwarzschild criterion.
Only using Ledoux+Efficient semiconvection one can get cores approaching the Schwarzschild case.
Of course these are only qualitative statements, and a quantitative comparison with other codes (of the kind Tuguldur is performing) is required.
Cheers,
Matteo
> Cheers
> Arlette
>
>
> Le 1 avr. 2013 à 22:54, Chris Mankovich <cmankovich at umail.ucsb.edu> a écrit :
>
>> Hey T,
>>
>> I can tell you that you don't need to bother with any controls beyond enabling Ledoux and setting an alpha_sc. The form for the composition gradient term "brunt B" now implemented in mesa by default can be found in the second instrument paper. I have no experience running massive stars with semiconvection, but in general for inefficient semiconvection (the limit of which is pure Ledoux) you can get quite small cores. I don't know that anyone has done the comparison with Langer 1985 for specific alpha values.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On Mar 31, 2013 2:06 PM, "Tuguldur Sukhbold" <sukhbold at ucolick.org> wrote:
>> Dear MESA users,
>>
>> just noticed that I said following backwards in my yesterday's email:
>>
>>> For example, it would be really hard to explode 1.d-3 model, as the CO core is too tiny, even 1.d-1 case is still very degenerate.
>>
>> I meant to say the opposite, too easy to explode. Basically I wanted to say that all of these 15Msun cases are developing really degenerate cores that one would 'usually' expect at much lower mass (~maybe around 10Msun or so). Sorry I was writing at 4am in the morning ;-)
>>
>> Tuguldur
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Tuguldur Sukhbold <sukhbold at ucolick.org>
>>> Subject: semiconvection
>>> Date: March 31, 2013 4:12:51 AM PDT
>>> To: "mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net" <mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> Cc: Stan Woosley <woosley at ucolick.org>
>>>
>>> Dear MESA users,
>>>
>>> I have a sort of general questions about setting up the semi-convection in MESA. I would be very grateful if anybody shares their experience using it especially on massive stars.
>>>
>>> 1) According to star/defaults/controls.defaults, we only need these two in our controls:
>>>
>>> use_Ledoux_criterion = .true
>>> alpha_semiconvection = some value
>>>
>>> is this really it? am asking this because I have found this document on the forum:
>>>
>>> http://mesastar.org/documentation/tutorials/zams-test-cases/semiconvection/view
>>>
>>> here it mentions these two extra lines:
>>>
>>> use_gradmu_alt_for_mlt = .true
>>> radL_comp_term_logRho_switch = 3
>>>
>>> says it is used to control computations of 'certain' gradients. I couldn't find any information on these in my version (4798), probably because this document is made for 4299..? Here I just want to make sure that I am not missing anything in the setup.
>>>
>>> 2) Now more importantly, what is the value of some value? According to the control.defaults:
>>>
>>> alpha_semiconvection = 0 ! 0.01 ! determines efficiency of semi convective mixing
>>>
>>> but I remember in previous versions of the code (and also in the document mentioned above) it used to claim that 1.d-3 is a typical value. Can someone tell me where exactly these numbers are coming from? If one checks the actual Langer's paper:
>>>
>>> http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1985A%26A...145..179L
>>>
>>> it says the value is more like 0.1 (see section 3).
>>>
>>> Attached figure shows the result of a quick survey I did in the past couple of hours. I took 15Msun models and run it from ZAMS until when the central temperature reached T_c=5.d8K, this is roughly the condition when the carbon starts igniting in the center. I have calculated the same model with bunch of different values of alpha_semiconvection [0.00001-100] (anything over 1 is crazy), plus the same model with just pure Schwarzschild criterion. In all figures dashed curve/line represent result from this pure Schwarzschild criterion. The red line in the last plot shows the rough red-supergiant size limit.
>>>
>>> First of all, varying the parameter from 1.d-3 to 1.d-1 produces quite significant changes. But the crazier thing is that in all cases the CO core I get is uncomfortably small. For example, it would be really hard to explode 1.d-3 model, as the CO core is too tiny, even 1.d-1 case is still very degenerate.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you find I made an error, also I would like to know how far people have tested this Langer's prescription in MESA?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Tuguldur
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
>> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete
>> for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam.
>> $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo
>> by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-users mailing list
>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
>> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
>> Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
>> on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
>> Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-users mailing list
>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete
> for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam.
> $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo
> by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2_______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
Dr. Matteo Cantiello ------------------------
Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics
Room 1226 Kohn Hall CA 93106-4030
University of California, Santa Barbara
---------------- http://matteocantiello.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20130402/32a152aa/attachment.html>
More information about the Mesa-users
mailing list