[mesa-users] what happened to run_star.defaults

Tue Oct 9 10:47:43 EDT 2012

Jose, there were some major changes in version 4411 in the directory
structure of mesa and names of files. For details see
http://mesastar.org/documentation/release-notes/bills-notes-on-mesa-4411-release-1

Agnes

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:49 AM,
<mesa-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Send mesa-users mailing list submissions to
>         mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         mesa-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         mesa-users-owner at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of mesa-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Missing reaction_Qs (Leonardo Santos)
>    2. Re: Missing reaction_Qs (Bill Wolf)
>    3. Re: Missing reaction_Qs (Chris Mankovich)
>    4. run_star.defaults? (Jos? Pedro Pinto Vieira)
>    5. Re: Binary capabilities on MESA (Roni Waldman)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:09:24 -0300
> From: Leonardo Santos <laugustogs at gmail.com>
> Subject: [mesa-users] Missing reaction_Qs
> To: mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>         <CAKBzG4jK3o1Gq35H=8zpRb0FQMM7vNF=bsv5Yj8Ar-j2PpCBnA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello guys,
>
> I just updated MESA, and I'm having a little problem (that wasn't ocurring
> in the previous version). When I run the software in the terminal, I get
> these erros:
>
>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rn13pg_to_n14          36           1
>
>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rne20pg_to_ne21         100           2
>
>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rna22pg_to_na23         116           3
>
>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rmg24pg_to_mg25         126           4
>
>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rmg25pg_to_mg26         132           5
>
>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rsi28pg_to_si29         139           6
>
>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rsi29pg_to_si30         148           7
>
>
> I have no idea how to fix this, but I guess it's related to the
> star_job_namelist.out file.
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> Leonardo Santos
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 14:13:28 -0700
> From: Bill Wolf <wmwolf at physics.ucsb.edu>
> Subject: Re: [mesa-users] Missing reaction_Qs
> To: Leonardo Santos <laugustogs at gmail.com>
> Cc: mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <24DFDC87-0E85-4E29-B82F-BBB08339654D at physics.ucsb.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Leonardo,
>
> What, exactly, are you running (e.g. star/work, star/test, a project of your own making)? Also, just for clarity, which version are you running, and what system are you running it on?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill
>
> On Oct 8, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Leonardo Santos <laugustogs at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I just updated MESA, and I'm having a little problem (that wasn't ocurring in the previous version). When I run the software in the terminal, I get these erros:
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rn13pg_to_n14          36           1
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rne20pg_to_ne21         100           2
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rna22pg_to_na23         116           3
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rmg24pg_to_mg25         126           4
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rmg25pg_to_mg26         132           5
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rsi28pg_to_si29         139           6
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rsi29pg_to_si30         148           7
>>
>>
>> I have no idea how to fix this, but I guess it's related to the star_job_namelist.out file.
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> --
>> Leonardo Santos
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
>> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
>> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
>> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev_______________________________________________
>> mesa-users mailing list
>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>
> ________________________
> William Wolf
> wmwolf at physics.ucsb.edu
>
> UCSB Department of Physics
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:15:54 -0700
> From: Chris Mankovich <cmankovich at umail.ucsb.edu>
> Subject: Re: [mesa-users] Missing reaction_Qs
> To: Leonardo Santos <laugustogs at gmail.com>
> Cc: mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>         <CAFGiHn39HcaJySSsEMAmAtCa7Wg_bfDgiQR_PPV5Ro-Pz9U5aQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Leonardo,
>
> I ran into this issue earlier when trying to run star from a working
> directory built from the older version 4442.  Run
>
> ./clean
> ./mk
>
> and see if your issue goes away.
>
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Leonardo Santos <laugustogs at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I just updated MESA, and I'm having a little problem (that wasn't ocurring
>> in the previous version). When I run the software in the terminal, I get
>> these erros:
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rn13pg_to_n14          36           1
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rne20pg_to_ne21         100           2
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rna22pg_to_na23         116           3
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rmg24pg_to_mg25         126           4
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rmg25pg_to_mg26         132           5
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rsi28pg_to_si29         139           6
>>
>>  missing reaction_Q for reaction rsi29pg_to_si30         148           7
>>
>>
>> I have no idea how to fix this, but I guess it's related to the
>> star_job_namelist.out file.
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> --
>> Leonardo Santos
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
>> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
>> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
>> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-users mailing list
>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>>
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:45:37 +0100
> From: Jos? Pedro Pinto Vieira <up090302017 at alunos.fc.up.pt>
> Subject: [mesa-users] run_star.defaults?
> To: <mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <c2925bc34d40c497ab1872a0a7613b67 at alunos.fc.up.pt>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi!
>
> I can't seem to find star/defaults/run_star.defaults, as indicated in
> the "how to use MESA star"! Is it now called star_job.defaults?
>
> A hand here would be much appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Jos? Pedro
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:49:33 +0200
> From: Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [mesa-users] Binary capabilities on MESA
> To: mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>         <CALsB45+a=g2Ke=JEH+0EWUGzYztQC-R0K6q7vLJMOfX--vmTcQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
> Following up on a recent discussion here, I started looking at binary
> evolution with MESA.
> I ran the binary_rlo_implicit example.
> I got results looking the same as documented on the mesa forum, however
> something looks peculiar:
> Whereas the companion mass, as plotted from the history.data of the primary
> is growing in mass, as it should, in the log2 and out file it loses mass,
> according to the mass loss laws set in the inlist2.
> Can anyone explain what is going on?
> Cheers,
> Roni
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
> Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
> what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
> Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>
>
> End of mesa-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 7
> *****************************************

-- 
Assistant Professor of Physics
Department of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy
Georgia College & State University
Milledgeville, GA 31061

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In science, you want to say something nobody knew before, in words
everyone can understand. In poetry, you are bound to say something
that everybody knows already in words that nobody can understand." --
Paul Dirac, Physicist