[mesa-users] Problem with the overshoot parameters

[Umang Gupta]

Thank you very much for the quick replies,
I could figure out the problem.

-Umang


On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Roni Waldman <roni181066 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Umang,
> From tests that I did, a 0.1 overshoot parameter in the "classic" step
> function scheme is equivalent to 0.008 overshoot parameter in MESA
> exponential scheme.
> Roni
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Aaron Dotter <aaron.dotter at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> As Matteo and Dennis have already pointed out, the way overshoot is
>>> handled in MESA is different than the "classic" way, which is the way most
>>> existing codes do it.
>>>
>>
>> And I should add, which is the way most existing codes *that I am
>> familiar with *do it*.*
>>
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
>> Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
>> Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
>> Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-users mailing list
>> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20121218/10b3673b/attachment.html>