[mesa-users] Problem with the overshoot parameters

Roni Waldman roni181066 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 01:11:16 EST 2012

Hi Umang,
>From tests that I did, a 0.1 overshoot parameter in the "classic" step
function scheme is equivalent to 0.008 overshoot parameter in MESA
exponential scheme.

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Aaron Dotter <aaron.dotter at gmail.com>wrote:

> As Matteo and Dennis have already pointed out, the way overshoot is
>> handled in MESA is different than the "classic" way, which is the way most
>> existing codes do it.
> And I should add, which is the way most existing codes *that I am
> familiar with *do it*.*
> Aaron
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
> Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
> Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
> Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-users mailing list
> mesa-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mesastar.org/pipermail/mesa-users/attachments/20121218/beeb7dff/attachment.html>

More information about the Mesa-users mailing list